The Global Warming Debate Thread

For all other chat which isn't directly related to lucid dreaming and the world of sleep and dreams.
User avatar
WildCat23
Posts: 137
Joined: 06 Feb 2012 23:27

The Global Warming Debate Thread

Postby WildCat23 » 20 Oct 2013 03:56

First off, let me get something straight,this IS NOT a flaming thread. If people begin flaming, I will have the thread deleted.

That being said, I figured this forum would be a good place to talk about this civilly, because lucid dreamers are generally more, well... lucid. This is not a thread to talk about what you heard on the news, or your friend told you; it is a thread for those who have actually looked into the (Hypothetical) issue of Global Warming.

Now, I will start by stating my opinion.

I do not believe it is an issue. I believe it is manipulation developed out of a (Very) bad model by a group of self-proposed "Scientists" who refuse to admit they're wrong. Now, everything, in reality supports this. When you look at a (Non-tampered with) model of temperatures over the last hundred years or so, it shows a slight increase in the 80's and 90's and a slight increase in the 2000's. Perfectly normal temperature fluctuation.

Also, when you look temperatures (Obviously difficult and inconsistent to find) over the last 2000 or so years, it actually looks something like this:

Image

Remember, keep it civil!
Last edited by WildCat23 on 20 Oct 2013 16:15, edited 1 time in total.
"I wandered home though the silent streets
And fell into a fitful sleep
Escape to realms beyond the night
Dream can't you show me the light? "
~2112

User avatar
lucidinthe sky
Posts: 1135
Joined: 10 Dec 2011 22:37
Location: Sacramento, California

Re: The Global Warming Debate Thread

Postby lucidinthe sky » 20 Oct 2013 04:58

If you don't think global warming is happening, I'm curious where you get your information. I would encourage you to read about it from many sources. I can't imagine that 99% of the world's scientists are "self-proposed". I don't really see much to debate when around 99% of the world's scientists who have examined the data are in agreement that the planet is heating up. There is an overwhelming amount of evidence to support it. There's not much denial any more except about whether or not it is man-made. But even there, 97% of scientists think it is. So there is slightly less of a consensus there.

The only thing really debated is how fast, how hot it will get, how high will ocean levels rise, how soon will the first ice free arctic summer comes, etc.

The real danger is the "positive feedback mechanisms" such as melting the permafrost which creates methane (worse than CO2) which causes more warming which melts more permafrost etc. or heating up the oceans which are the largest carbon sink on the planet. The problem is that the warmer they get, the less CO2 they can absorb, so there's another positive feedback mechanism. Or water vapor, the absolute worst greenhouse gas. Heat up the water, you get more water vapor and around and around you go. If one of these positive feedback mechanisms gets going, things could escalate rather quickly and forget trying to stop it. If you are around for another 20 years, my guess is that you will be completely doubt free about it then.

In the meantime, I'm sticking with the 99%.
Have you ever had a dream, Neo, that you were so sure was real? What if you were unable to wake from that dream? How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real world? Morpheus

User avatar
Goldkoron
Posts: 257
Joined: 04 Jul 2013 05:01
Location: Middletown, California

Re: The Global Warming Debate Thread

Postby Goldkoron » 20 Oct 2013 05:17

I read something about the world being warmer 800 years ago. The Earth's climate is constantly changing. I'd like to doubt that we are responsible for the warming, I mean, the world is a big place, and we are like ants.
Last edited by Goldkoron on 20 Oct 2013 05:26, edited 1 time in total.
Do a reality check

User avatar
mikeg313
Posts: 68
Joined: 04 Feb 2013 02:14
Location: Belize

Re: The Global Warming Debate Thread

Postby mikeg313 » 20 Oct 2013 05:26

I believe we are on the last tips of the ice age, so it will increasingly get warmer and us humans may have contributed to it slightly which has caused it to accelerate a little. But mostly negligible.

Scientists do have legit data, but they are also paid by government and as long as they can keep the population separated, its financially beneficial and keeps the engine of fear turning.

Its always about money.

User avatar
HAGART
Posts: 3179
Joined: 05 Jan 2012 21:09
Location: CANADA

Re: The Global Warming Debate Thread

Postby HAGART » 20 Oct 2013 07:09

WildCat23 wrote:I figured this forum would be a good place to talk about this civilly, because lucid dreamers are generally more, well... lucid


My lucid and terse mind says, "Energy is conserved".
(Create new energy from the ground and it has nowhere to go.... and still the sun keep beating down....)
If we all lucid dreamed this world would be a better place.

User avatar
Summerlander
Posts: 3639
Joined: 22 Sep 2011 19:52

Re: The Global Warming Debate Thread

Postby Summerlander » 20 Oct 2013 15:41

I agree with lucid inthesky.

[ Post made via Android ] Image
"Empty cognizance of one taste, suffused with knowing, is your unmistaken nature, the uncontrived original state. when not altering what is, allow it to be as it is, and the awakened state is right now spontaneously present."

- Padmasambhava

User avatar
lucidinthe sky
Posts: 1135
Joined: 10 Dec 2011 22:37
Location: Sacramento, California

Re: The Global Warming Debate Thread

Postby lucidinthe sky » 20 Oct 2013 15:49

There is a new report out by the IPCC*, a scientific body that is described below. Here's the link.

http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/#.UmPqmPlQFwI

The problem with global warming is that it's not something that can be "crisis managed". There will be a time when no one debates this any more, but that will be a time when absolutely nothing can be done. We already have 97% of world scientists on board. I can't see any interests that governments would have to promote the idea of global warming, in fact the opposite seems more likely. They are more interested in denial since they are funded in large part by the polluting economy. I was looking at Chevron's website where even they are agreeing that we are are changing the climate. How is it in interest of a huge oil company to admit that using their products is causing global warming? Again, I think the time for debate on this subject is long gone. There may be debate, but it is NOT among scientists.

Here's a quote from their study: "The more you know about the field of climate science, the more you're likely to believe in global warming and humankind's contribution to it." The study also concluded that "the debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely nonexistent among those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processes. The challenge now is how to effectively communicate this to policy makers and to a public that continues to mistakenly perceive debate among scientists."


* "The Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change is the leading body for the assessment of climate change, established by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) to provide the world with a clear scientific view on the current state of climate change and its potential environmental and socio-economic consequences. The IPCC is a scientific body. It reviews and assesses the most recent scientific, technical and socio-economic information produced worldwide relevant to the understanding of climate change. It does not conduct any research nor does it monitor climate related data or parameters. Thousands of scientists from all over the world contribute to the work of the IPCC on a voluntary basis. Review is an essential part of the IPCC process, to ensure an objective and complete assessment of current information. Differing viewpoints existing within the scientific community are reflected in the IPCC reports. Because of its scientific and intergovernmental nature, the IPCC embodies a unique opportunity to provide rigorous and balanced scientific information to decision makers."
Have you ever had a dream, Neo, that you were so sure was real? What if you were unable to wake from that dream? How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real world? Morpheus

User avatar
WildCat23
Posts: 137
Joined: 06 Feb 2012 23:27

Re: The Global Warming Debate Thread

Postby WildCat23 » 20 Oct 2013 16:13

*Make sure to use the scroll bar at the bottom for the pictures.*
lucidinthe sky wrote:If you don't think global warming is happening, I'm curious where you get your information. I would encourage you to read about it from many sources. I can't imagine that 99% of the world's scientists are "self-proposed". I don't really see much to debate when around 99% of the world's scientists who have examined the data are in agreement that the planet is heating up. There is an overwhelming amount of evidence to support it. There's not much denial any more except about whether or not it is man-made. But even there, 97% of scientists think it is. So there is slightly less of a consensus there.

The only thing really debated is how fast, how hot it will get, how high will ocean levels rise, how soon will the first ice free arctic summer comes, etc.

The real danger is the "positive feedback mechanisms" such as melting the permafrost which creates methane (worse than CO2) which causes more warming which melts more permafrost etc. or heating up the oceans which are the largest carbon sink on the planet. The problem is that the warmer they get, the less CO2 they can absorb, so there's another positive feedback mechanism. Or water vapor, the absolute worst greenhouse gas. Heat up the water, you get more water vapor and around and around you go. If one of these positive feedback mechanisms gets going, things could escalate rather quickly and forget trying to stop it. If you are around for another 20 years, my guess is that you will be completely doubt free about it then.

In the meantime, I'm sticking with the 99%.

That 99%, is like all their other numbers, manipulated. It was a survey given to like 12000 scientists, of which only 65 actually did the survey, the 97% of which were trying to push Global Warming. 65 does not seem like a very large number to me being the percent of "All scientists" it represents.

Also, the Earth has been cooling the last 16 years no matter what they try to tell you. My favorite is that the oceans are being heated by the atmosphere causing them to warm. Did physics change at Y2K? THey called it a "Retrospective prediction" and used it to make their incorrect predictions somehow seem (Somewhat) merit-able.

Image
Going up... and coming back down, as usual.

Meanwhile, while Al Gore is claiming he invented the internet, when you actually look at glacial extent, the ice at the south pole has actually been getting thicker, and covering more ground. If you notice, Global Warming enthusiasts never actually bring up the South pole alone, only the North pole, and occasionally they will use the word "Poles," when actually only referring to the North pole.

Image
Remember this?

Image
Suddenly warming doesn't seem like as much of a problem...

Image

Image

Image
"I wandered home though the silent streets
And fell into a fitful sleep
Escape to realms beyond the night
Dream can't you show me the light? "
~2112

LucidLink
Posts: 405
Joined: 08 Apr 2013 16:48

Re: The Global Warming Debate Thread

Postby LucidLink » 20 Oct 2013 17:34

I am appalled people still doubt Global Warming, as it is it is going to kill us all if we can't even agree on if it's happening or not, let alone on how to stop it!

I completely agree with Lucid in the sky.

Also it's hard to be civil when people are supporting the destruction of our planet by saying the problem does not exist.

I can see it exists just in how the winters have been in my area.
[ Post made via iPhone ] Image

User avatar
deschainXIX
Posts: 922
Joined: 07 Aug 2013 18:18
Location: Virginia, USA

Re: The Global Warming Debate Thread

Postby deschainXIX » 20 Oct 2013 20:25

I agree with lucidinthe sky as well. I think that the reason most people don't believe it is because they don't want to. They're scared ... and simply subconsciously refuse to look things in the face.
Well said.


Return to “Off-Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests