one. wrote:LOL, it is ad hominem because you were attacking my argument against Pesticide ridden food, on the premise that ???
The premise is the OP. Re-read it. And attacking your bad grammar is not an ad hominem seen as I figured it to be quite incredible to contruct a good counterargument when you are that stupid with spelling and syntax. Logically poly-insouciant bringing humdrum casuistry to the table.
my poor English skills were evidence of my lack of knowledge on the matter of food/health???
No. It's evidence of a contrarian with ulterior motives and an unrelated bone to pick with Summerlander. You think I'm stupid, my love?
yest it's TRUE that i have bad gamer/spelling but bringing that into a discussion on food while my standard is sufficient for you to understand IS ad hominem.
I'm not sure I even understood you. You made that assumption. Apparently you also seem very sure about knowing other people's minds ...
A sophist is some one who believes truth is relative, and will argue any side based on there beliefs whether or not they match reality.
Lack of typos here. Where did copy this definition from?
i know loads of people like this and you remind me of a few of them. ad hominem? maybe
It's ironic that you don't seem to know yourself.