Dawkins reminds me of the same people who persecuted the right to die of people who face horrible deaths because of disease because again, there is no grey, it's all black and white and the grey gets auto colored black by his bias.
In the mean time while you two come up with another of your endless arguments here is an interesting study on life after death where science and math was utilized and the results are interesting. I'd tell you two to read it with an open mind but I know that is not possible, so please respond that it's bad science and proves nothing so we can validate your POV. Results of world's largest Near Death Experiences study published
Thirty-nine per cent of patients who survived cardiac arrest and were able to undergo structured interviews described a perception of awareness, but interestingly did not have any explicit recall of events.
Among 2060 CA events, 140 survivors completed stage 1 interviews, while 101 of 140 patients completed stage 2 interviews. 46% had memories with 7 major cognitive themes: fear; animals/plants; bright light; violence/persecution; deja-vu; family; recalling events post-CA and 9% had NDEs, while 2% described awareness with explicit recall of ‘seeing’ and ‘hearing’ actual events related to their resuscitation. One had a verifiable period of conscious awareness during which time cerebral function was not expected.